What is cultural appropriation? Causes and examples

The concept of cultural appropriation is increasingly debated in circles of social psychology, anthropology and sociology, although it is not new.

The idea that one culture can feed on another through non-violent means has aroused great controversy, and, as we will see, part of the problem is that there are two very different positions: those who believe that cultural appropriation is a form of real domination that must be fought, and those who believe that it does not exists.

However... What exactly is this about cultural appropriation and why is it being heard more and more about it? We will see it in the following lines.

• You may be interested: "The 10 types of values: principles that govern our lives"

Cultural appropriation: definition

Cultural appropriation can be understood as the use of typical cultural elements of one ethnic group by another, stripping it of all its meaning and trivializing its use. In short, this is what happens when a cultural element is usurped with purposes that have nothing to do with those attributed to it.

However, as happens many times in the social sciences, there is no single agreed definition about what cultural appropriation is, and that's why some people add a nuance to this definition: this cultural "theft" must be produced by a hegemonic or dominant culture, to something else that is subjected to the first.

Thus, this last detail serves to introduce another topic in the way in which we can understand this phenomenon: power dynamics, the disappearance of certain cultures at the cost of the enrichment of other

Some examples of cultural appropriation

Many of the contexts in which people or organizations have been criticized for falling into cultural appropriation are linked to art, fashion and aesthetics. For example, some fashion magazines have been attacked and boycotted (although with little effect) for using white models to represent non-western aesthetics with clothes from cultures considered "exotic".

The same has happened in the world of music. Several singers have been criticized for resorting to cultural appropriation, like Miley Cyrus with the twerk or Katy Perry for wearing clothing associated with the Japanese stereotype. The same is done, in retrospect, with Elvis Presley, for commercializing music that until a few decades ago was part of African-American culture, until he made it fashionable.

On the other hand, certain universities and organizations of all kinds have also been criticized for commercializing acts related to non-Western style meditation, or even the yoga. There are many commercial activities associated with elements easily identifiable with certain cultures.

The controversy

Cultural appropriation is a very problematic concept. One reason is that, on the one hand, it is very arbitrary attribute an aesthetic, element or ritual to an ethnic group determined and not others.

For example, dreadlocks are usually associated with ethnic groups linked to Africa or in any case to Jamaica, a country with a black majority. However, technically, in the past there were already groups of white people who used dreadlocks, such as certain peoples of Ancient Greece or religious groups of Europe. On the other hand, it would also be possible to criticize people associated with the populations of Africa and Asia. for using a cultural element of ethnic subgroups that are in a worse situation than the own. When determining what an ethnic group is it is possible to adopt infinite perspectives

Another problem is that many people do not believe that cultural appropriation is a problem, even if it exists. That is, they emphasize the idea that cultures have no limits and therefore flow, constantly change and pass from one hand to another. From this point of view, no one should suffer or worry about something like that, given that the normal thing would be for a culture to remain immutable and isolated from the rest.

In addition, another topic that is often talked about is that for cultural appropriation to exist, there must first be cultural elements that belong to a few hands. Usurpation occurs when the person who previously enjoyed something stops doing so due to the action of another person, who takes possession of that resource. However, in cultural appropriation this does not happen; in any case, something that previously only used a smaller group of people becomes popular.

• You may be interested: "Types of religion (and their differences in beliefs and ideas)"

A broader view of the problem

Keep in mind that for many people cultural appropriation cannot be understood simply by analyzing the way in which a habit, aesthetic or ritual becomes popular. What happens is that this phenomenon is, in any case, the symptom that there is a culture that subdues the rest.

We have already seen an example that leads us to this idea: the popularization of music with African American roots by Elvis, a target. The same occurs with twerk, which until recently was associated with groups of low-income non-whites. Or even with Buddhism, a religion that because of the stereotypes surrounding meditation has been associated with peace, even though it is perfectly possible for Buddhists to fall for it. violence fruit of religious fanaticism.

Cultural appropriation, then, would be a way of commodifying cultural aspects that have existed for a long time outside the margins of the market, and that have been introduced into it from the perspective of white western culture. Even when this serves to wash the image of a particular ethnic group, this is the result of ignorance, a sign of the extent to which these populations are removed from the decision-making centers of the economy.