Difference between modernity and postmodernity
Modernity and postmodernity they refer to two movements or currents of European thought that were based on historical criticism and the proposal of new social values.
Modernity is the name of a movement whose antecedents can be found in the 15th century during the European Renaissance and which was consolidated in the 18th century during the Enlightenment. Modernity was essentially characterized by "proposing the passage from tradition to change, called progress, through logic and reason."
Postmodernity is a movement that emerged in the second half of the twentieth century that is based on the critique of modernity and the conviction that this movement has failed in its search for a new worldview based on the progress.
| Modernity | Postmodernity | |
|---|---|---|
| Definition | Current of thought characterized by promoting the idea of social progress through knowledge and reason. | Current of thought characterized by questioning the ideas of modernity, considering their failure for social advancement. |
| Source | It began to originate during the Renaissance (15th century) and crystallized during the 18th century. | Mid 20th century (70s and 80s). |
| Characteristics |
|
|
What is modernity?
Modernity is understood to be an intellectual movement that had its philosophical origins in the 15th century, during the Renaissance, but which crystallized during the 18th century. It was at that time that his proposals finally materialized in light of the political, economic, social and cultural changes that took place at that time.
Modernity promoted individuality, the use of reason, the protection of citizens' rights and a new political order that was key to the reorganization of power structures in Europe, by introducing concepts such as the nation-state and the separation of powers.
Characteristics of modernity
The idea of progress in modernity revolved around three essential axes:
- Man as a new measure of things.
- Reason and science as methods to interpret reality.
- A new administrative political structure.
In more detail, these would be some of the essential characteristics of modernity:
Narrative of progress through knowledge
Modernity raises an idea of progress and social evolution based on knowledge and expressed in science, economics, philosophy, law and politics as central knowledge. In modernity there is no place for the mythological or mystical narrative posed by religion.
Worship of rational thought
Modernity proposes a liberation of doctrinal thought in exchange for subjectivity and individual thought. According to this current of thought, reason and logic must displace religious doctrine as a resource to explain the nature of things.
See also Difference between humanism and Renaissance.
Anthropocentric vision
For modernity, man is the new epicenter of the world, since all reason and logic and, therefore, all methods and science that will allow social progress start from there.
Change of political structures
The end of the feudal model brought with it a new form of territorial political division proposed by modernity: the nation-state.
These are portions of defined territories with a constant population and a power structure divided into three central institutions:
- Executive power: directed by who orders and executes the laws.
- Legislative power: run by lawmakers.
- Power of attorney- Run by law enforcement.
See also State Types.
What is postmodernity?
Postmodernity is a current of thought that emerged in the mid-twentieth century as a critique of modernity.
His main argument is that the model proposed by the predecessor movement failed, while the idea of progress through knowledge is not enough to achieve the well-being of society.
While there is no clear starting and ending point for postmodernity, the fall of the Berlin Wall in 1989 is seen as the climax of postmodernity. While the global changes driven by the attacks of September 11 mark the decline of this system of thought.
Characteristics of postmodernity
The rejection of the ideas raised by modernity was the common thread of postmodernity, and it was expressed in different characteristics:
Pessimism
Postmodernity is responsible for emphasizing the failure not only of modernity, but of all the political, economic and social models that emerged from it. For postmodern thought, the new global dynamic is incompatible with the proposal of modernity.
Criticism of the media as axes of power
For postmodernism, the mass media are (along with economic power) the new centers of power due to their ability to influence the masses. As a consequence, a homogenization of thought is generated that is contrary to the critical vision necessary to promote changes in the established order.
Criticism of consumer dynamics
According to postmodernity, the capitalist dynamic driven by the Industrial Revolution has been replaced by an economy based on consumption. This drives the massive production of goods and services that in most cases are ephemeral or expendable in nature.
See also Difference between capitalism and socialism.
Denial of loss of privacy
The emergence of the internet, the web and social networks drove a series of technological and social changes that result in a loss of privacy of the individual in exchange for information and communication snapshot.
See also 27 advantages of social networks.
Questioning the new communicational processes
In postmodernity, the message is no longer so relevant, but the way it is presented and the impact it may have, beyond its content. In addition, there is an overexposure to information and a tendency for ephemeral and irrelevant content.
Permanent criticism
In postmodernity, religion, politics, the economic system and social dynamics are questioned permanently, in an attempt to find answers that allow finding new ways of progress and Advance.
Concern for the environment
In postmodernity there is a greater awareness and evidence of the changes generated by industrialization. This has generated new movements dedicated to the protection of natural resources and their ecosystems.
See also Difference between sustainable and sustainable development.
