Analysis and interpretation of the Vênus de Milo sculpture

Vênus de Milo is a statue of Grécia Antiga, whose author is unknown. It was uncovered in 1820, na ilha de Milo. Since then, it has been taken to France and exhibited at the Louvre Museum, where this page is located.

A sculpture is wrapped in mystery, its authorship is not known and there is more than a version about its uncovered, starting from little safe sources.

In truth, it has never been rushed, the image of "deusa sem braços" has become the most disseminated, reproduced and recognized works of Art History.

Since it was uncovered, Vênus de Milo continues to awaken the attention and curiosity of the public who visit the Louvre.

Vênus de Milo, frontal view. — Vênus de Milo exposed at the Louvre Museum, frontal view.

Analyze the work

Composition

Com 2.02 meters high, to this and compost by two large pieces of marble from Stoppages, separating imagem feminina pela waist. Joined by iron gramps, to statutory smaller parts sculpted separately, like the arms and feet. This was a common artistic technique in the neoclassical period, helping to place the work chronologically.

instagram story viewer

Venus de Milo, not Louvre, being admired public hair. — Vênus de Milo, not Louvre, admired visiting hairs.

It also peels his height, too much for a woman of the time, the logo was thought to represent a divine figure, greater in power and stature than a common human.

Body posture

On the other hand, the female figure is found with a bent and slightly raised skeleton leg, leaning its weight on the straight leg. The twisted body in a sinuous position accentuates her natural curves, marking her waist and her quadril.

It proves that the author of the work would be paying homage to deusa do Amor, known and venerated for its femininity and sensuality.

As the upper part of your body, say goodbye, revealing your shoulders, lips and belly, deusa and humanized, represented by our daily scene. Because of her being just like a cloth wrapped around the waist, I defend myself that Venus would be entering or leaving the bathroom.

Did you dress

There is an obvious contrast between the top and bottom of the statues. Assim, or unknown artist, contrasts with delicacy of the feminine body or the weight of the mantle, creating opposing textures.

To reproduce the texture of the mantle, he sculpted several doubles and pregas, not marble, as would happen in the past, playing with lights and shadows. Some interpretations defend that a position of deusa, as a twisted body, would be or objective of securing or covering that is correct.

Face

Representing the ideal of beauty and a classical tradition, a woman with a serene face, which does not convey great emotions. Its enigmatic expression and its distant olhar remain impossible to decipher.

As it happens with other works that will mark the Art History, the mysterious expression of Venus and the smooth life of his traços, he has conquered admirers for two seasons. Her hair, long and divided, does not mean, it is imprisoned but it reveals a wavy texture, recreated, not marble, sculptor hair.

Items to be lost

Embora also does not have or pes esquerdo, in the absence that more stands out na statues, and also those that imortalizou, is to absence of two arms. Perhaps because it is such a remarkable characteristic, there are several lendas that I tried to guess or that deusa Carregava and how she lost members.

Some sources narrate that together with Venus, I was also found uma mão que sure uma maçã. The element seems to make sense of the statute, since sometimes it was represented as a fruit, that she received from Páris when she chose a greater beauty of divinities.

Embora to chamado theory "knob of discórdia" seems appropriate, "Milo" means "maçã", it could be a reference to or local where this is feita.

Meaning of work

Representing some of the most important and venerated deuses of Classical Antiquity, Vênus de Milo symbolizes the ideal of facial and body beauty of the time. Being a few original works of Ancient History that last years, their mutilated imperfection contrasts with the precise work of the sculptor.

According to some specialists, it also gives popular propaganda for the French government to promote the work, its fame for another reason, something that makes it unique. Pela position of the body and the waves, not the mantle and our hair, the woman seems to be in motion, seen from all angles.

Curiosities about a Vênus de Milo

Or what happened like his arms?

A questão arouses so much curiosity that it originated from various studies. At times, it ran to lenda that the arms of this time had been torn away in a battle between the sailors and the natives, to decide that they would eat her. A history, however, is false.

A hypothesis that there is more consensus that I have never been found with my members, that Teriam was broken and lost as a tempo.

Ornamentation

Embora tenham disappeared, we know that Venus wore metal ornaments (brincos, bracelets, tiara), or that we can verify the existence of orifices where the peças encaixavam. It is also accredited that this statue has more additions and that it has been painted at the same time. I do not survive vestiges that I buy.

Finish

Or just the status is not all the same. Being more aperfeiçoado on the front and less on the back. This practice was widely used for statues designed to be placed in niches.

Não é uma Vênus

Despite my hair being eternalized, it is still a Venus. I tell you that he belongs to the Hellenistic world and would pay homage to deusa grega, it would be an Aphrodite, not that davam a deusa do love.

Still, there are dubious about her identity. Some theories suggested that Amphitrite, Poseidon's wife, would represent whom I would worship na ilha de Milo.

Contest to find sósia da Vênus

Taken as a prototype of classical beauty, Venus de Milo continues to be synonymous with feminine charm. In the United States, in 1916, the universities of Wellesley and Swarthmore promoted a contest to find Sósia da Vênus de Milo among her alunas.

Grécia loved Vênus de Volta

I have been acquired by the French logo from being uncovered, some of the most emblematic works of the Greek culture ever more voltou in your country of origin. A Grécia claims or it will be direct to the work of what was private for both time, requesting the return of this 2020 statistic.

History of work

Uncovered

Second to the most popular version, to descoberta you have a place in April 1820, na ilha de Milo. Some sources narrate that it was camponês Yorgos Kentrotas that achou to statute, when it procures stones for the construction of a wall.

A home of a French sailor who was not local would have seen little and recognized its historical and artistic value, buying native years from Venus. A statute was lifted for França It was offered to King Louis XVIII, and was later exhibited in the Louvre Museum and was highly promoted by the public.

Historical context in France

Nesse period, the country has been forced to restore some works of art looted during the dominion of Napoleão (between as quais uma Vênus de Medici, Italian). Assim, Vênus de Milo emerged as a source of national pride, increasing the French artistic heritage and status.

A need to show Vênus de Milo as a work of art of more high value, in order to prestige or own French, complicit in the process of identification of the work.

Identification process

The authorship of this statistic and the date of its breeding continues to be unknown, whether or not it has allowed us to come to some conclusions. Initially, when it was raised for the Louvre, a work was identified as belonging to the classical period, or most prestigious at the time (480 a. C. - 400 a. C.). His authorship was attributed to the illustrious circle of Praxiteles.

Second to some sources, there are indications that Serious statue of an artist bem less old and conceived: Alexandros de Antióquia, filho de Menides. Possibly it was cut down by the French government, so that it was more interesting than a neoclassical work, a period that was considered decadent in Greek art.

Eventually, the Museum had to acknowledge the identification error, as various experts attested that the work was later. Of fato, some studies apontam that must have been conceived between 190 a. C. e 100 a. C. According to specialists, isso can be denied by the own applied techniques, as well as the position of the woman and her clothes.

Representações da Vênus de Milo

Despite all the debate and controversy, the work continues to be appreciated and valued both by public and by criticism. The figure of Vênus de Milo has become iconic in Western culture, being copied, reproduced and reinvented in various forms over the past few days.

Some examples: