What is CHEISM

queism isthe improper omission of a preposition (usually from) when it goes before the conjunction that, in cases where it is indispensable for prayer. The erroneous suppression of the preposition is considered a normative error.

This problem generally occurs in the construction of subordinate clauses and is common in colloquial language. Despite this, it should be avoided in any context, since the royal academyof the Spanish language is clear in this sense and considers it an improper use in all its forms. If we take it from the normative perspective, queísmo represents the opposite error to dequeísmo, the latter is widespread in some areas of Spain and is common in environments informal.

In this lesson from a Teacher we are going to tell you what is queismo with examples so that you can better understand what we are referring to.

Index

1. Meaning of queismo
2. Cheism and the subordinate clause
3. Examples of queismo
4. Formulas to avoid cheism
5. What is dekeism?

Queísmo is the forgetting of a preposition (generally from) before the conjunction that, when the preposition is required by some word of the statement. This mistake is often made in the subordinate clauses of the Spanish language that use the sequence about what.

This incorrect use of language has become popular as a way to shorten phrases or simplify sentences, something very typical of informal settings. Despite this, is not accepted as a colloquial form in any way and it is, for all intents and purposes, an undue suppression of a necessary word that should not be ignored.

Now that you know what the cheism, we are going to analyze the context in which it happens. And it is that the subordinate clause is one that connects two sentences with all their attributes. In it is the so-called main sentence and another that depends on the structural nucleus of the first.

If analyzed, the subordinate clause lacks syntactic autonomy, so the focus should always be placed on the two components of this phenomenon separately. Let's say that one is subordinate to the other and depends on it (on the main one), hence the truth of its nomenclature.

Subordinate clauses are differentiated according to the types of links that unite the main with the secondary. They are the following:

• conjunctions
• Relative Pronouns
• conjunctive adverbs

It is in this link that the appearance of cheism takes place, an indispensable link to connect the subordinate clauses in a correct and normative way. It should also be remembered that there are other forms of link the sentences and it is about coordination or parataxis and juxtaposition.

These are some examples of queismo in which the correct and incorrect form of each sentence is shown.

• Incorrect: I have the intuition that we will move on to the next phase.
• Correct: I have an intuition that we will go to the next phase.
• Wrong: It was about time they returned.
• Correct: It was time for them to return.
• Wrong: I did it despite being told there would be consequences.
• Correct: I did it even though I was told there would be no consequences.
• Incorrect: Nobody noticed that they had started dancing.
• Correct: Nobody noticed that they had begun to dance.
• Incorrect: I'm sure it was closed.
• Correct: I'm sure it was closed.
• Wrong: He said he would sing before the show ended.
• Correct: He said he would sing before the show ended.
• Wrong: I convinced her to do it.
• Correct: I convinced her to do it.

Cheism is a incorrect construction in all cases, so it is advisable to completely eliminate it in speech and in written language. In cases where Spanish is the mother tongue and there is a certain expressive facility, there is certain formulas that help to identify if a use of the preposition is required or not.

They are the following:

• The entire subordinate clause is replaced by that. For example: I am convinced of (that you are lucky) for I am convinced of that. However, I am convinced that it is not a phrase with its own meaning.
• yesand transforms into interrogative replacing the subordinate clause with why. In the example above, what am I convinced of?, but in no case, what am I convinced of?

These tools are especially useful for practicing correct constructions and change the habit of queismo. They can be practiced in writing and repaired later, on occasions when one speaks fluently. They can be clear techniques both to learn and to refine the language.

The antithesis of cheism is in dequeism, an opposite error and equally frequent in certain environments. It is the non-normative use of the preposition of together with the conjunction que in sentences in which corresponds, such as direct object noun subordinate clauses or subordinate clauses. completive.

It has been concluded that this error is a derivative of the crossing of two syntactic structures. Because it is the opposite of the incorrect use that concerns us, cheism is also called on various occasions as antidequeism. It is crucial to master the correct form of both constructions if you want to use the language correctly and build the subordinate clauses in their normative structure.

Here we show some examples of dekeism and the correct way to formulate the sentences:

• Incorrect: He has told me that he will be leaving soon.
• Correct: He has told me that he will be leaving soon.
• Incorrect: He said that the table was wrongly set.
• Correct: You said the table was wrongly set.
• Incorrect: They thought that they would arrive at another time.
• Correct: They thought they would arrive at another time.
• Incorrect: I think that he was not very nice to him.
• Correct: I think you weren't very nice to him.

If you want to read more articles similar to What is cheism - with examples, we recommend that you enter our category of Grammar and Linguistics.